{"id":164,"date":"2018-09-19T05:31:47","date_gmt":"2018-09-19T05:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/?page_id=164"},"modified":"2018-09-19T05:32:05","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T05:32:05","slug":"morphology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/home\/morphology\/","title":{"rendered":"Morphology"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Types of Morphemes<\/h3>\n<p>A <strong>morpheme<\/strong> is the smallest unit of grammatical or semantic meaning in a language. A morpheme is distinct from a phoneme because although a phoneme is the smallest meaningful unit of sound in a language, by itself a \/p\/ or \/m\/ does not have grammatical or semantic meaning. It must be combined with other phonemes into a morpheme to have such meaning. <\/p>\n<p>When discussing morphemes, it is important not to confuse them with words, since there is a difference between the two. Consider the following words: <em>the<\/em>, <em>boy<\/em>, <em>runs<\/em>, and <em>unlucky<\/em>. Although each of these is a \u201cword,\u201d they are all very different in their make-up and usage. The term &#8220;word&#8221; therefore is not very precise. When we turn to the first two of these examples\u2014<em>the<\/em> and <em>boy<\/em>\u2014we see that it is not possible to divide them into smaller units of grammatical or semantic meaning. For example, we cannot divide <em>boy<\/em> into smaller units such as b- or \u2013oy. In other words, <em>boy<\/em> is a single morpheme. The same is true of <em>the<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The word <em>runs<\/em>, however, can be divided into smaller units, that is, into more than one morpheme: <em>run<\/em> and \u2013<em>s<\/em>. Each of these has a distinct meaning, and so <em>run<\/em> and \u2013<em>s<\/em> are each morphemes. The word <em>unlucky<\/em> can be divided into three morphemes: <em>un<\/em>-, <em>luck<\/em>, and \u2013<em>y<\/em>. Each of these has a meaning that we know and recognize as English speakers. Here is where we see the distinction between morphemes and words. We do not consider <em>un<\/em>&#8211; or &#8211;<em>y<\/em> or &#8211;<em>s<\/em> as &#8220;words,&#8221; but they each have a distinct meaning, i.e., they are each morphemes. <\/p>\n<p>The examples above reveal that there are different types of morphemes: <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Free morphemes<\/strong> can stand on their own as words; they do not have to be attached to other morphemes. Examples: <em>the<\/em>, <em>boy<\/em>, <em>run<\/em>, and <em>luck<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bound morphemes<\/strong> cannot stand alone but must be bound to other morphemes. Examples: \u2013<em>s<\/em>, <em>un<\/em>&#8211; and &#8211;<em>y<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Bound morphemes are often <strong>affixes<\/strong>. This is a general term that comprises <strong>prefixes<\/strong>, which are added to the beginnings of words, like <em>re<\/em>&#8211; and <em>un<\/em>-, and <strong>suffixes<\/strong>, which are added to the ends of words, like \u2013<em>s<\/em> and &#8211;<em>ness<\/em>; some languages also have <strong>infixes<\/strong>, which are added into the middle of words, but these are rare in English. <\/p>\n<p>Bound morphemes are further divided into two subtypes: <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Derivational morphemes<\/strong> change the meaning or the part of speech of a word (i.e., they are morphemes by which we &#8220;derive&#8221; a new word). An example is <em>un<\/em>-, which gives a negative meaning to the word it is added to, \u2013<em>y<\/em>, which turns nouns into adjectives, or &#8211;<em>ness<\/em>, which turns adjectives into nouns.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inflectional morphemes<\/strong> add grammatical information to the word, such as \u2013<em>s<\/em> on <em>runs<\/em>, which tells us that it is 3rd person singular present tense verb, or the \u2013<em>s<\/em> on <em>boys<\/em>, which tells us that there is more than one boy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>There are eight inflectional suffixes, or more simply inflections, in English: <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>-s on verbs: 3rd person sg, present tense (he runs, she walks) <\/li>\n<li>-ed on verbs: past tense: (I walked, they joined) <\/li>\n<li>-ing on verbs: progressive (I was walking; they were joining) <\/li>\n<li>-en on verbs: past participle (I was beaten; she has eaten) <\/li>\n<li>-s on nouns: plural (boys, books)<\/li>\n<li>-\u2018s on nouns; possessive (boy\u2019s, book\u2019s)<\/li>\n<li>-er on adjectives: comparative (quicker, slower) <\/li>\n<li>-est on adjectives: superlative (quickest; slowest) <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Several of these inflections are similar phonologically, but do not confuse them. The &#8211;<em>s<\/em> on the end of 3rd person singular verbs, the &#8211;<em>s<\/em> plural on nouns, and the -&#8216;<em>s<\/em> possessive ending are the same purely by coincidence. Also, do not confuse the &#8211;<em>ing<\/em> inflectional ending used to make verbs progressive (&#8220;I am singing&#8221;) with the derivational morpheme &#8211;<em>ing<\/em> used to make verbs into nouns (&#8220;Singing is a fun thing to do&#8221;). They sound the same, but they are used differently. Finally, do not let spelling confuse you. We signify possessive plurals in spelling by adding an apostrophe to the end of the word (e.g., <em>boys&#8217;<\/em>) but the only inflectional ending here is the s-plural. The apostrophe is just a spelling convention.<\/p>\n<p>There is one final distinction between different kinds of morphemes: <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>content morphemes<\/strong>, which have a clear semantic meaning (like <em>book<\/em>, <em>luck<\/em>, <em>un<\/em>-, &#8211;<em>y<\/em>, <em>boy<\/em>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>function morphemes<\/strong>, which include all inflectional morphemes like \u2013<em>s<\/em>, and \u2013<em>ed<\/em>, but also include free morphemes such as <em>the<\/em>, <em>of<\/em>, <em>with<\/em>, <em>and<\/em>, <em>but<\/em>, and words like that. These words signify the grammatical relationships between words and give structure to a sentence. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The wikipedia page on <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Function_word\">function words<\/a> has an excellent example of the difference between content words and function words. Read these two sentences: <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The winfy prunkilmonger from the glidgement mominkled and brangified all his levensers vederously. <\/li>\n<li>Glop angry investigator larm blonk government harassed gerfritz infuriated sutbor pumrog listeners thoroughly. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>In the first sentence, all the content words have been replaced with nonsense words, but notice how the grammatical structure of the sentence is still clear. You can tell that <em>winfy<\/em> is an adjective, that the words <em>mominkled<\/em> and <em>brangified<\/em> are past tense verbs, and so on. In the second sentence the content words are English but the function words have been replaced. This sentence is entirely incomprehensible! <\/p>\n<h3>Allomorphs <\/h3>\n<p>Allomorphs are non-meaningful variants of a morpheme. For example, the -s plural takes three distinct phonological forms in the words <em>boys<\/em>, <em>books<\/em>, and <em>dishes<\/em>. If we write the three words in IPA, [b\u0254\u026az], [b\u028aks] and [d\u026a\u0283\u026az], we see that the plural suffix has three forms: [s], [z], and [\u026az]. These are three non-meaningful variants, allomorphs, of the -s plural morpheme.<\/p>\n<p><!--Think about the past tense markers in these three words: jumped, drowned, educated. What are the three allomorphs of our past tense morpheme? --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Types of Morphemes A morpheme is the smallest unit of grammatical or semantic meaning in a language. A morpheme is distinct from a phoneme because although a phoneme is the smallest meaningful unit of sound in a language, by itself a \/p\/ or \/m\/ does not have grammatical or semantic meaning. It must be combined [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":6,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-164","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":165,"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/164\/revisions\/165"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusche.faculty.unlv.edu\/hel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}